Slick

Slick v. CableCom, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20223:22-cv-03415California2,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KASEY SLICK, Case No. 22-cv-03415-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS

CABLECOM, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendant.

12 Kasey Slick (“Plaintiff”) brings this putative class action alleging that CableCom LLC (“Defendant”) violated California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). Cal. Bus. Code § 17200, et seq. (Dkt. No. 2.) Defendant moves to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and requests sanctions. (Dkt. No. 13.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefing, and having had the benefit of oral argument on August 4, 2022, the Court concludes that it has subject matter jurisdiction and GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss without leave to amend and DENIES Defendant’s motion for sanctions. The UCL claim fails because Plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law and Defendant has not established that sanctions are warranted under the Court’s inherent authority. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.