San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20225:20-cv-00824California6,968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, Lead Case No. 5:20-cv-00824-EJD Plaintiff, Consolidated with No. 5:20-cv-00826 EJD 9 v. ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERT CITY OF SUNNYVALE, T DE RS AT GI AM NO CN HY U O KF , AIA NN D W JOR NE AN T, HK AEV NI N Defendant. SHEFFTZ

Re: Dkt. Nos. 112, 113, 114

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER,

14 Plaintiff, 15 v.

CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW,

17 Defendant. 18

Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Plaintiff”) initiated these suits against Defendants City of Sunnyvale (“Sunnyvale”) and City of Mountain View (“Mountain View”) under the citizen suit enforcement provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”), to address the allegedly unlawful discharge of bacteria pollution by these Cities. Defendants have filed motions in limine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.