Valles

Valles v. Fort Mason

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20224:20-cv-04192California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

6 DANIEL VALLES, Case No: 20-cv-04192 SBA 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. 9 FORT MASON CENTER, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiff Daniel Valles (“Plaintiff”) brings this personal injury action against Fort Mason Center (“FMC”), The Guardsmen, MTM Builders, Inc. (“MTM”), and the United States of America (“USA”), alleging claims for dangerous condition of public property, premises liability, and negligence. The Guardsmen and FMC counterclaim against MTM for indemnity and contribution. The Court has original jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims against the USA pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1), and supplemental jurisdiction over the remainder of the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Following the Order Granting Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement, Dkt. 91, the USA and all claims against it have been dismissed, Dkt. 93. The remaining state law claims are between citizens of California. A district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.