Litvinova
Litvinova v. The City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TATYANA LITVINOVA,
Case No. 18-cv-01494-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF JUDGMENT
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN AND ORDER
FRANCISCO,
Defendant.
15 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs seek reconsideration of the summary judgment granted to Defendant under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After a full review of the record, it is apparent that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs, so pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearing set for September 15, 2022 is vacated. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration is denied. II. LEGAL STANDARD As “[a]n extraordinary remedy which should be used sparingly,” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) requires…