Pauly

Pauly v. Stanford Health Care

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20223:18-cv-05387California1,492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAKENZIE PAULY, Case No. 18-cv-05387-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING

MOTION FOR TERMINATING

STANFORD HEALTH CARE, SANCTIONS Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 157, 195, 208, 209

12 On July 2, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for terminating sanctions against defendant “based on the violation of their duty to preserve evidence, the spoilation of relevant evidence, and the resulting prejudice to Plaintiff.” Dkt. No. 157 at 1. On August 22, 2022, Magistrate Judge Hixson issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the motion be denied. Dkt. No. 195. Plaintiff objects to certain findings and Judge Hixson’s recommendation that the motion be denied. Dkt. No. 209. Plaintiff has also made an administrative motion to excuse late filing of her exhibits in support of her objections. The Court GRANTS the administrative motion to excuse late filing. See Dkt. No. 208. For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.