McCarthy
McCarthy v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 LISA MCCARTHY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05832-JD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
v. AND STAY
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., et al., 10 Defendants.
11 In this antitrust action, a group of consumers allege a conspiracy among the defendant banks and financial institutions to fix the intra-bank interest rate known as the USD LIBOR. Dkt. No. 1. The Court denied plaintiffs’ requests for a preliminary injunction. Dkt. No. 351. This order resolves defendants’ motions to dismiss. The defendants jointly filed a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 315. Defendants also filed a separate “merits” motion challenging plaintiffs’ complaint on various grounds under Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7). Dkt. No. 316. The ICE defendants separately filed a supplemental brief raising additional, individual arguments for dismissal. Dkt. No. 319.1 The…