Jones

Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20223:15-cv-02726California870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMANDA JONES, Case No. 15-cv-02726-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 331 11 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. ECF No. 331. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. II. BACKGROUND This case arises from Defendants’ alleged negligence when Plaintiff and her scooter fell during transit on an AMTRAK Highway 17 Express Bus #2310. On July 21, 2022, the Court held a pretrial conference and issued an Order re Motions in Limine. ECF Nos. 319, 321. In the Order, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 14 and found Plaintiff failed to demonstrate the reliability of John McKinney’s expert opinion. ECF No. 321 at 8-9.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.