Farina

Farina v. Hoskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20223:22-cv-05031California761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE: DANIELA M. FARINA, Case No. 22-cv-05031-JSC

Debtor.

ORDER RE: IN FORMA PAUPERIS

____________________________________ STATUS ON APPEAL TO THE

BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

DANIELA M. FARINA,

Appellant, Re: Dkt. No. 3 v. JANINA M. HOSKINS, Trustee, Appellee.

15 The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) has referred this action to this Court “for the limited purpose of ruling on the [in forma pauperis] motion.” (Dkt. No. 1.) Ms. Farina filed the underlying Chapter 7 bankruptcy action on January 18, 2022. In re Daniela M. Farina, Case No. 22-10021 (N.D. Cal. Bankr.). Two months later, the Chapter 7 Trustee filed an ex parte application for entry of order for judgment of possession and writ of assistance. In re Daniela M. Farina, Case No. 22-10021, Dkt. No. 161 (N.D. Cal. Bankr. Mar. 7, 2022). The Trustee alleged that Ms. Farina and her father had illegally taken possession of certain real…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.