Austin v. Lyft, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-09345-MMC Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
V. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION LYFT, INC., Defendant. 12
The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's “Motion for Reconsideration, New Trial, || Recusal,” filed September 9, 2022. The Court having read and considered the motion, the motion is hereby Denied for a || lack of subject matter jurisdiction, plaintiff's having filed a notice of appeal on September 5, 2022. See Davis v. U.S., 667 F.2d 822, 824 (9th Cir.1982) (“The filing of a notice of || appeal generally divests the district court of jurisdiction over the matters appealed.”). 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 || Dated: September 12, 2022 / afm LY. L,
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28