Mizar

Mizar v. indiGO San Francisco, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20223:22-cv-04033California2,743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT MIZAR, Case No. 22-cv-04033-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

INDIGO SAN FRANCISCO, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Robert Mizar brought this action against his former employer indiGO San Francisco, LLC (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 1 at 23.) Plaintiff alleges Defendant violated California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and the California Labor Code’s overtime provisions. (Id. at 26–31.) Defendant moves to compel arbitration and stay the proceedings pending the outcome of that arbitration. (Dkt. No. 8.) Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing, and having had the benefit of oral argument on September 15, 2022, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. BACKGROUND Plaintiff signed an agreement to arbitrate certain disputes related to his employment. (Dkt. No. 8-2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.