Wynne

Wynne v. Audi of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20224:21-cv-08518California1,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMY WYNNE, Case No. 21-cv-08518-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER ON OUTSTANDING

MOTIONS

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 70, 71, 72, 79, 80, 81, 83 AUDI OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

Defendants Sanctus LLC dba Shift Digital (“Shift”) and Audi of America, LLC (“Audi”) and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen”) filed motions to dismiss Plaintiff Amy Wynne’s first amended complaint. [Docket Nos. 70, 71.] They also filed a joint motion to stay discovery until the court rules on the motions to dismiss on the ground that they are potentially dispositive and raise only legal, not factual, issues. [Docket No. 72.] In response to the motions to dismiss, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”) in which she dropped her claim for relief under the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and amended her California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) claim which purportedly addressed the deficiencies identified by Defendants in their motions. [Docket Nos. 76…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.