Lawson

Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20223:15-cv-05128California1,736 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAEF LAWSON, Case No. 15-cv-05128-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

GRUBHUB, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 253, 272, 274, 289, 290 Defendants.

12 The Court denied without prejudice Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. Nos. 253, 260), but construes the relevant portions as a motion for partial summary judgment on the legal question of whether the ABC test applies to Plaintiff’s expense reimbursement claim, (Dkt. No. 253 at 22–25; Dkt. Nos. 269, 272, 274). See Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc., 13 F.4th 908, 917 (9th Cir. 2021) (“[W]e allow the trial court to decide in the first instance whether the ABC test applies to Lawson’s expense reimbursement claim.”). The Court also ordered supplementary briefing on the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Bowerman v. Field Asset Services, Inc., 39 F.4th 652 (9th Cir. 2022). (Dkt. Nos. 287, 289, 290.) Having carefully considered the parties’ briefing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.