Lopes

Lopes v. Oracle America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20225:22-cv-01815California2,881 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CORNELIUS LOPES, Case No. 22-cv-01815-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., et al., PREJUDICE Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 19]

12 Now before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration brought by Defendants Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) and James Sharum (collectively “Defendants”). ECF No. 19. Defendants argue that Plaintiff Cornelius Lopes must arbitrate his claims because of an arbitration provision in his employment contract. Id. Lopes did not file an opposition. The Court vacated its hearing. ECF No. 29. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. I. BACKGROUND Lopes filed this action against Oracle and Sharum, asserting claims for violation of the National Labor Relations Act, defamation, invasion of privacy, discrimination,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.