Price
Price v. Wells Fargo & Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANISHA LEE PRICE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03128-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
v. TO DISMISS
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants.
12 Janisha Lee Price and Carmen Zamarripa bring state law wage and hour claims against their current and former employer Wells Fargo & Company, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (collectively “Wells Fargo”). Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims for failure to state a claim is now pending before the Court. After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the September 15, 2022 hearing, and DENIES the motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs’ claims are pled with sufficient specificity. BACKGROUND Ms. Price is currently employed by Wells Fargo as a telephone “Mortgage Customer Service Representative and a Home Loan…