Donahue

Donahue v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20223:21-cv-00448California2,935 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUSTIN DONAHUE, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00448-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

COMPANY,

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's ("Union Pacific") Motion for Summary Judgment, filed August 5, 2022. Plaintiffs Justin Donahue ("Donahue"), Jason Campbell ("Campbell"), and Jacob Goss ("Goss") have filed opposition, to which Union Pacific has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege each said plaintiff formerly worked as a conductor for Union Pacific (see Compl. ¶¶ 29, 43, 55), a position that required him to "read[ ] and interpret multicolored railroad traffic signal lights on signal masts" (see Compl. ¶¶ 30, 44, 57).2 Plaintiffs further allege that each said plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.