In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20225:19-cv-04286California3,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ASIF KUMANDAN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04286-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

GOOGLE LLC, et al., DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 223]

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion seeking to seal documents submitted with Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. See ECF No. 223. Defendants Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. (together “Google”) submitted a statement in support. See ECF No. 226. Plaintiffs did not respond to Defendants’ statement. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.