Driz
Driz v. FCA US, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ROBERT A. DRIZ, Case No. 22-cv-01605-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO
FCA US, LLC, STRIKE Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 15]
12 Plaintiff Robert A. Driz (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against Defendant FCA US LLC (“Defendant” or “FCA”) arising out of alleged defects in his 2019 Chrysler Pacifica. Plaintiff asserts five warranty statute violations (First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims) and one claim of fraudulent inducement (Sixth Claim). Complaint, ECF No. 1. Defendant has moved to dismiss only Plaintiff’s fraud claim and to strike the request for punitive damages. ECF No. 15-1 (“Motion”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss and DENIES Defendant’s motion to strike. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background …