Harris

Harris v. Door Dash, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20223:21-cv-09445California809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN JEROME HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-09445-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

DOOR DASH, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendant.

12 The Court previously determined that Plaintiff’s minimum wage claim satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 1915, but that his overtime claim as pleaded in the amended complaint did not. (Dkt. No. 10.) The Court set a deadline of April 19, 2022 for Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint adding factual allegations to his overtime claim. (Id.) Plaintiff did not do so. (Dkt. No. 11.) The Court extended the deadline to amend the complaint until June 3, 2022. (Id.) Plaintiff did not amend before that date. On June 23, 2022, the Court ordered service of the amended complaint, but Plaintiff had not yet provided a summons to the Court. (Dkt. No. 12.) On July 6, 2022, Plaintiff submitted a “response” to the Court’s earlier screening order that includes a second amended complaint (“SAC”). (Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.