Contreras

Contreras v. Gamboa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20225:20-cv-06206California634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ERNESTO MORALES CONTRERAS, Case No. 20-cv-06206-BLF Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR AN

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN

APPEAL

MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Re: Dkt. No. 18 Respondent. 13 14 Petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his 2016 criminal judgment and sentence. Dkt. No. 1. On December 29, 2021, the Court denied the petition on the merits and entered judgment in favor of Respondent. Dkt. Nos. 12, 13. On May 23, 2022, Petitioner filed a motion to reopen the time to file an appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). Dkt. No. 14. Finding Petitioner satisfied Rule 4(a)(6), the Court granted the motion and reopened the time to file an appeal such that Petitioner 21 1 Rule 4(a)(6) reads: 22 Relief from the deadline for filing an NOA may be obtained by a motion in the district 23 court under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) (motion for an extension of time) or 4(a)(6) (motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.