Krohn

Maxim I Properties v. Krohn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20224:12-cv-00449California10,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAXIM I PROPERTIES, Case No. 12-cv-00449-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

A.M. BUD KROHN, et al. Re: Dkt. No. 282 Defendants

12 This matter involves recovery of costs to address environmental contamination at a property in San Jose, California. Now pending is a motion for determination of good faith settlement between Plaintiff Maxim I Properties (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Moyer Products (“Moyer”) (together, “Settling Parties”). [Docket Nos. 282 (“Mot.”); 316 (“Reply”).] Cross- Defendant/Counterclaimant Renesas Electronics America Inc. (formerly known as Integrated Device Technology, Inc.) and Cross-Defendants Central Coating Company, Inc.; The Sherwin- Williams Company; Telewave Inc., and Thermionics Laboratory, Inc. (together, “Non-Settling Parties”) all oppose this motion. [Docket No. 313 (“Opp’n”).] The court held a hearing on the motion on May 12, 2022. For the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.