Maury

Maury v. Seamon

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20224:22-cv-04463California804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT E. MAURY, Case No. 22-cv-04463-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

C. SEAMON, et al., Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials at San Quentin State Prison and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. He is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. For the reasons discussed below, the case is DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.