Vera

Vera v. FlexShopper, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20223:22-cv-01797California5,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIAS ANTONIO VERA, Case No. 22-cv-01797-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT,

ATTORNEYS’ FEES, AND COSTS

FLEXSHOPPER, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff brings fair debt collection practices claims against a debt collector and its agent. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendants failed to appear or defend themselves and the Clerk of Court entered default on May 23, 2022. (Dkt. No. 12.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, attorneys’ fees, and costs. (Dkt. No. 17.) Having carefully considered the briefing, and having vacated the scheduled hearing, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), the Court GRANTS the motion in PART. BACKGROUND A. Complaint Allegations Plaintiff, a resident of Alameda County, California, fell behind on payments on his consumer loan from Defendant FlexShopper, LLC. FlexShopper hired Defendant Mark A. Nestor, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.