Puthuff

Puthuff v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20225:21-cv-00792California5,486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 D.L.P., Case No. 21-cv-00792-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 32 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff D.L.P.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)2 denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1381, et seq. D.L.P. contends that the ALJ erred by failing to consider his mild mental limitations and medication side effects in determining his residual functional capacity (“RFC”) and in finding that he could return to his past relevant work as a jeweler. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers and the relevant evidence of record, for the reasons set forth below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.