Zafra

Zafra v. East Bay Municipal Utility District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20223:22-cv-03535California769 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RENATO ZAFRA, Case No. 22-cv-03535-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT

AND REOPENING CASE

EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff’s motion to set aside the dismissal is scheduled for a hearing on October 7, 2022. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Clerk shall reopen this case. Defendants may renotice the motion to dismiss the complaint for a hearing on the Court’s calendar. 18 DISCUSSION Plaintiff filed this employment discrimination case on May 10, 2022, in the Superior Court for the County of Alameda. On June 15, 2022, defendants removed the action to this Court, and on June 17, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.