Norman

Norman v. The White House

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20223:22-cv-05154California2,277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GARRED F. NORMAN, Case No. 22-cv-05154-JSC

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

THE WHITE HOUSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendants.

12 The Court has granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and therefore is required to review the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims are insufficiently pled. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before October 24, 2022. BACKGROUND I. The Complaint Plaintiff names 34 individuals and entities as defendants in this matter. (Dkt. No. 1 at 3– 7.) In his “statement of facts,” Plaintiff alleges the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) drugged him and attempted to entrap or frame him for a murder. He also states that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.