Yuksel

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

11 Edip Yuksel, No. CV-21-00137-TUC-RM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Twitter Incorporated, 15 Defendant.

17 Pending before the Court are multiple motions in the above-captioned matter: (1) 18 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 17); (2) 19 Defendant’s Motion to Change Venue/Transfer Case to the to the U.S. District Court for 20 the Northern District of California (Doc. 18); (3) Plaintiff’s Motion to Deny Twitter’s Request to Change Venue (Doc. 23)1; and (4) Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s 22 23 24 1 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed this document as a Motion for the Court to rule on. However, the Motion is more properly construed as a Response to Defendant’s Motion to Change Venue/Transfer Case. Plaintiff did not file a Response to the Motion to Change Venue/Transfer Case, and the Motion to Deny Twitter’s Request to Change Venue responds to that Motion. Therefore, the Court will construe the Motion as a Response to Defendant’s Motion to Change…