Fitzgerald

Fitzgerald v. GEM Funding, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20225:21-cv-08641California7,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHAEL SCOTT FITZGERALD, et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-08641-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS

GEM FUNDING, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 95, 98, 99, 102, 110, 126, 136 Defendants.

13 Defendants separately bring seven motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Dkt. Nos. 95, 98, 99, 102, 110, 126, 136. The Court finds the motions appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motions to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michael Fitzgerald resides in Santa Clara County and operates his scuba diving business, California Scuba Center, LLC (“California Scuba”), which is headquartered in Fresno, California. FAC, Dkt. No. 88 ¶¶ 5-6. This suit arises from thirteen separate “Merchant Cash …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.