Woods

Woods v. Google, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20225:11-cv-01263California2,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RENE CABRERA, ET AL., Case No. 5:11-cv-01263-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE GOOGLE’S MOTIONS TO

STRIKE REPORTS OF SAUL

v. SOLOMON

GOOGLE LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 442, 596 Defendant.

Defendant Google LLC (“Google”) has filed two separate motions to strike the expert reports of Saul Solomon pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). ECF 442, 596. Plaintiffs oppose the motions (ECF 455, 609). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Google’s motions in part. I. BACKGROUND Because the parties are intimately familiar with the history of this case, this Order sets forth only what is necessary to resolve the issues presented in Google’s motion. Saul Solomon (“Solomon”) is Plaintiffs’ damages expert. He issued reports on July 10, 2015 (ECF 441-10), January 18, 2018 (ECF 424-80), May 15, 2018 (ECF 320-14), and November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.