Johnson v. Pho Hanoi, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20224:22-cv-00537California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 4:22-cv-00913-YGR Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

g PHo HANot, INC., Re: Dkt. No.

Defendant. TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL OF RECORD: Plaintiff has filed a notice that his claim for injunctive relief under the ADA has been || rendered moot. (Dkt. No. 24.) Since injunctive relief is the only remedy available under the || ADA, plaintiff's entire ADA claim is now moot and is dismissed. All that remains in this case is plaintiffs Unruh Act claim. Courts decline to exercise || supplemental jurisdiction over Unruh Act claims after the parallel ADA claim has been dismissed. || Additionally, when a “high-frequency” litigant such as Johnson asserts an Unruh Act claim in i || federal court with an ADA claim, this constitutes an exceptional circumstance that justifies Z || …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.