Weinstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDREW WEINSTEIN, Case No. 21-cv-05175-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

KATAPULT GROUP, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 68, 69 Defendant.

13 There are two joint letter briefs before the court describing outstanding discovery disputes. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. This is a contract dispute. A former finance consultant alleges, among other charges, that he was wrongfully denied stock options owed as part of his compensation. The remaining claims in the operative complaint include (1) breach of contract for failure to fulfill quarterly $15,000 payments; (2) declaratory relief; and (3) quantum meruit. Dkt. 57. The parties now approach the close of fact discovery. See Dkt. 67. The first discovery letter brief at issue (Dkt. 68) comes primarily from defendant and focuses on…