1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 B.J., Case No. 22-cv-03765-MMC

9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO

10 v. DISMISS AND VACATING HEARINGS

11 G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 14 Before the Court are three motions, filed September 1, 2022, to dismiss plaintiff’s 15 initial complaint, brought on behalf of, respectively, Marriott International, Inc., Choice 16 Hotels International, Inc., and Hilton Domestic Operating Company, Inc. Defendant G6 17 Hospitality has joined in the motion filed by Hilton Domestic Operating Company. On 18 September 22, 2022, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (“September 22 filing”).1 19 A party may amend a pleading "once as a matter of course within . . . 21 days after 20 service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), 21 (e), or (f), whichever is earlier." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). "[A]n amended pleading 22 supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent." Bullen v. De 23 Bretteville, 239 F.2d 824, 833 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 947 (1957); see also 24 Falck Northern California Corp. v. Scott Griffith Collaborative Solutions, LLC, 25 F.4th 25 763, 765 (9th Cir. 2022) (holding filing of amended complaint "renders [initial complaint] 26

27 1 On September 23, 2022, plaintiff substituted a corrected version of her 1 without legal effect") (internal citation and quotation omitted)). 2 In the instant case, plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint within 21 days after 3 service of defendants’ motion to dismiss, and, consequently, was entitled to amend as of 4 || right. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). 5 Accordingly, defendants’ motions to dismiss the initial complaint are hereby 6 DENIED as moot, and the hearings scheduled for December 2, 2022 are hereby 7 || VACATED. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 || Dated: 9/29/2022 MY.

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

11 United States District Judge 12

13

14

16

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28