Cuestas

Cuestas v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20225:20-cv-08746California5,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANNA CUESTAS, Case No. 5:20-cv-08746-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29 Defendant.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (“the Commissioner”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. See Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (“P MSJ”), Dkt. No. 28; Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (“D MSJ”), Dkt. No. 29. On November 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a reply. See Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (“Reply”), Dkt. No. 32. Plaintiff argues that the Court should enter judgment under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and either (1) reverse the final decision of the Commissioner without remand for a rehearing and award benefits based on a finding of disability or (2) reverse the final decision of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.