Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. v. Blaze Mobile, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20225:21-cv-02989California5,536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, LTD., et Case No. 5:21-cv-02989-EJD al., ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S Plaintiffs, MOTION UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(C) FOR JUDGMENT OF v. UNPATENTABLITY UNDER SECTION 101 AS TO ADVERTISING PATENTS BLAZE MOBILE, INC., et al., 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 47 13 Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) initiated this action for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement as to eight patents owned by Defendants Blaze Mobile, Inc. and Michelle Fisher (collectively “Blaze”). Blaze answered and counterclaimed for infringement. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), Samsung moves for judgment of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Dkt. No. 47. Blaze filed an opposition with an appendix identifying the representative claims for the 20…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.