King

King v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20223:21-cv-02843California2,469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TROY KING, Case No. 21-cv-02843-AGT

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FOR LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING

FRANCISCO, AS MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE

13 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 32, 34, 35, 36 14 Troy King filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”) alleging Fourteenth Amendment violations and California tort claims arising out of a parking ticket King received. Following dismissal of King’s original complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), and after the Court-ordered deadline to amend had passed, King filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) realleging the claims that were dismissed with leave to amend, and adding, without leave of Court, several new claims against CCSF. Currently before the Court are the following motions relating to King’s untimely FAC, listed in the order of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.