Winckowski

Winckowski v. Human Interest, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20223:22-cv-01734California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY WINCKOWSKI, Case No. 22-cv-01734-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL AND

v. SUMMONS

HUMAN INTEREST, INC., Defendant.

I. MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant Human Interest Inc.’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is granted. Dkt. No. 14. Plaintiff Winckowski has alleged fraudulent conduct on the part of Human Interest. See Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 7 (“plaintiff discovered that HUI was engaging in what plaintiff observed and reasonably believed to be questionable and illegal pricing of its products and services and deceiving and defrauding HUI’s customers”); ¶ 8 (“plaintiff further discovered HUI had misrepresented the nature of his duties and responsibilities for the job position he had accepted”). These allegations sound in fraud, and are subject to the heightened pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b). See Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA, 317 F.3d 1097, 1102-05 (9th Cir. 2003). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.