Robertson

Nelson v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20223:19-cv-08057California4,480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM LLOYD NELSON, Case No. 19-cv-08057-EMC

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION,

J. M. ROBERTSON, AND REQUIRING AN ELECTION

FROM PETITIONER

Respondent. Docket No. 41 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION William Lloyd Nelson filed this pro se action for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent moved to dismiss for, inter alia, failure to exhaust all claims, Docket No. 25; Mr. Nelson filed a “traverse” which the Court construed as an opposition to Respondent’s motion, Docket No. 30; 1 and Respondent filed a reply, Docket No. 34. The Court found that Mr. Nelson had filed a mixed petition of exhausted and unexhausted claims, granted in part and denied in part Respondent’s dismissal motion, and ordered Mr. Nelson to elect how to proceed. Docket No 38. Mr. Nelson filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.