Gastelum
Gastelum v. Bain Capital LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 21-cv-08639-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION; DENYING MOTION
BURLINGTON STORES, INC., FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT
COMPLAINT
Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 30
14 Pending before the Court are two motions: defendant Burlington Stores, Inc.’s 15 (“Burlington”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) 16 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction1 (Dkt. No. 14), and Mr. Gastelum’s motion for leave to file a 17 supplemental complaint (Dkt. No. 30). These motions were deemed suitable for determination 18 without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b); Dkt. No. 27. 19 Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, the Court finds that 20 Mr. Gastelum’s federal claim is moot and that the entire action should be dismissed. In addition, 21 the Court denies Mr. Gastelum’s motion for leave to supplement his complaint. 22 …