Watzke

Watzke v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20224:22-cv-05469California749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICHOLAS WATZKE, Case No. 22-cv-05469-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. 9 Re: ECF No. 1 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Nicholas Watzke filed this pro se action. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. ECF No. 12. The Court now screens Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), a court shall dismiss an action brought by a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis if the court determines that the action fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). The standard for determining whether a plaintiff has failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.