Whitaker

Whitaker v. Jack Sen Benevolent Association

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20223:21-cv-03469California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN WHITAKER,

Case No. 21-cv-03469-JCS Plaintiff, 5 V. ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JACK SEN BENEVOLENT

ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. 9 Plaintiff filed a notice stating that “the barriers alleged in his Complaint have been || removed and currently the subject property is fully remediated and accessible for person with = 12 || disabilities, specifically wheelchair users” and therefore, that he is “now satisfied his claim for

13 || injunctive relief has been rendered moot.” Dkt. 19. In response to the Court’s Order to Show

v Cause Why Case Should not be Dismissed [dkt.20], Plaintiff further states that he does not object

|| to the Court dismissing his claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) on the basis Q 16 || that it is moot and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his California Unruh Act

= || claim, which is the only remaining claim in the case. Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.