Ji
Ji v. Naver Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYDNEY JI, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05143-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 47, 52, and 53 NAVER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss. See Dkt. Nos. 47 (“Naver Mot.”), 52 (“Foreign LINE Mot.”), and 53 (“LINE E-A Mot.”). The motions are fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 67 (“Naver Opp.”), 68 (“LINE Opp.”), 71 (“Naver Reply”), and 79 (“LINE Reply”).1 The Court held a hearing on May 12, 2022. See Dkt. No. 96. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Sydney Ji, June Abe, Lee Shubert, Kira Tomlinson, Ranela Sunga, and Stefanie Bonner (“Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendants Naver Corporation (“Naver”), Naver Cloud Corporation (“Naver Cloud”), Naver Cloud America Inc. f/k/a/ Naver Business Platform America Inc. (“Naver Cloud…