Roffman
Roffman v. Perfect Bar, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MEHVA ROFFMAN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02479-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
v. FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
PERFECT BAR, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendant.
12 Plaintiffs move for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s September 2, 2022 order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 36; see Dkt. No. 34.) After carefully considering the motion, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-9(d), and DENIES the motion. Plaintiffs base their motion on Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3), “[a] manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court before such interlocutory order.” They specifically challenge the Court’s conclusion that “Plaintiffs’ claims based on the theory that Defendant’s front-label protein claims are misleading without the corresponding PDCAAS figures on the nutrition facts panel are…