Charles
Charles v. Target Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHERYL CHARLES, Case No. 20-cv-07854-HSG
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TARGET CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 63 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Target Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 63. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Cheryl Charles initially filed this slip and fall case in San Mateo County Superior Court. See Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”) at 5. Defendant removed based on diversity jurisdiction. See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff alleges that she slipped and fell while shopping at a Target store in Colma, California. See Compl. at 8. Plaintiff brings a single cause of action for premises liability. See id. at 8–9. Defendant now moves for summary judgment. …