Saloojas, Inc. v. CIGNA Healthcare of California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20223:22-cv-03270California5,981 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SALOOJAS, INC., Case No. 22-cv-03270-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS

CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF

CALIFORNIA, INC.,

12 Defendant.

14 Plaintiff Saloojas, Inc. (“Saloojas”) alleges that Defendant Cigna Healthcare of 15 California, Inc. (“Cigna”) violated the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“the 16 FFCRA”) and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“the CARES 17 Act”), as well as other federal and state laws, by failing to reimburse Saloojas for COVID- 18 19 testing services Saloojas provided to its patients. See, e.g., Compl. (dkt. 23) ¶ 2. Cigna 19 moves to dismiss. See Mot. (dkt. 22). As explained below, the Court finds this matter 20 suitable for resolution without oral argument, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7-1(b), 21 VACATES the hearing currently set for October 7, 2022, and GRANTS Cigna’s motion to 22 dismiss. 23 I. BACKGROUND Saloojas is a provider of COVID-19 diagnostic testing services. Compl. ¶ 10. It brings this putative class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.