Johnson v. BW RRI II LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20223:21-cv-04447California420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-04447-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.

BW RRI II LLC, Defendant.

11 On October 3, 2022, Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed a Notice of Indication of Mootness of ADA Claim for Injunctive Relief. ECF No. 30. Johnson states as follows:

As of October 3, 2022, Defendant has represented that the subject business has been closed and is being sold. This suggest that Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief is moot. Plaintiff acknowledges that with Defendant’s indication that the subject business closed, he has no objection to the dismissal of his ADA claim.

Further, should this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s sole federal question claim, Plaintiff has no objection to this Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claim so that he can refile that action in state court. 19 Under the ADA, plaintiffs may only seek injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.