Kim

Kim v. Allakos Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20224:20-cv-01720California633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SUNG KIM, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01720-JSW

Plaintiffs, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND

REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

v. FROM PLAINTIFFS; RESOLVING

PLAINTIFF’S EVIDENTIARY

ALLAKOS INC., et al., OBJECTIONS; GRANTING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR

Defendants. LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 55

13 This matter is scheduled for a hearing on October 14, 2022 to consider Defendants’ motion 14 to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). On September 16, 2022, Plaintiffs 15 filed an administrative motion for leave to file a sur-reply, which Defendants oppose. Plaintiffs 16 argue that Defendants raised a new argument in reply. The proposed sur-reply argues why the 17 Court should not consider the argument and addresses the merits of the argument. 18 Plaintiffs also object to three exhibits that Defendants submitted with the reply brief. (See 19 Dkt. No. 51-1, 51-2, 51-3, 51-4, Reply Declaration of Stephen Blake and Exs. G-H.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.