Hazzard

Hazzard v. Schaaf

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20224:22-cv-02921California1,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GENE HAZZARD, Case No. 22-cv-02921-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

LIBBY SCHAAF, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by the following Defendants: the City of Oakland (“City”); Mayor Libby Schaaf (“Mayor Schaaf”); David Silver; Barbara J. Parker; Courtney Ruby (“Ruby”); and Ed Reiskin (collectively “City Defendants”).1 The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this cases, and it HEREBY GRANTING Defendants’ motion, with leave to amend as set forth at the conclusion of this Order. BACKGROUND In 2015, Mayor Schaaf launched an initiative called Oakland Promise (the “Initiative”), “a cross-sector partnership between the Oakland Unified School District (‘OUSD’), the Mayor’s Office, and the East Bay College Fund” (“EBCF”), and recommended that the City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.