Keene
Keene v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SELINA KEENE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01587-JSW
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. REHEARING
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Re: Dkt. No. 32 FRANCISCO, et al., 15 Defendants.
16 Now before the Court is the motion for rehearing due to manifest error of law or fact filed by Plaintiffs Selina Keene and Melody Fountila (“Plaintiffs”). The Court construes the motion to be a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order granting individual defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Under Local Rule 7-9(b), reconsideration may be sought only if one of the following circumstances exists: (1) a material difference in fact or law from that presented to the Court prior to issuance of the order that is the subject of the motion for reconsideration; (2) new material facts or a change of law occurring after issuance of such order; or (3) a manifest failure by the…