Robertson

Robertson v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20225:20-cv-02523California2,252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REGINALD ROBERTSON, Case No. 20-cv-02523 BLF Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION; DENYING

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

J. KAISER-NEVEL1, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 (Docket Nos. 65, 66) 17 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against staff at the Santa Rita Jail (“Jail”) in Dublin, California. Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the third amended complaint (“TAC”), Dkt. No. 27, stated cognizable claims for retaliation and violation of due process, exercised supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims, and ordered Defendants D. Bussell, J. Alvarez, M. Ella, G. Harris, C. Wong, and Alameda County to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 35. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff filed opposition, and Defendants filed a reply. Dkt. Nos. 44, 56, 57. On August 1, 2022, the

1 Although Mr. J. Kaiser-Nevel was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.