Mackey

Mackey v. Bloomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20223:22-cv-05105California1,568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

19 Plaintiff makes three claims. In his first claim, he alleges that he has never committed a 20 violent offense, but he discovered in 2020 that in 2015, Defendant Correctional Counselor Della 21 Baker placed a document in his “C-File” indicating, falsely, that he committed a robbery and a 22 kidnapping. Plaintiff requested removal of the document, but it remains in his file. In his second 23 claim, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Forensic Psychologist Kristina Lee Anne Reynoso falsely 24 assessed him as high risk for violence based upon a 2016 positive test for marijuana and no 25 evidence of violence. He alleges that this assessment was used for his 2021 parole hearing. In his 26 third claim, Plaintiff alleges that Reynoso also falsely stated in her assessment that Plaintiff traded 27 sex for housing. He alleges that in 2021, the parole board denied him parole, found that he should not be assessed as high risk, and told him to avoid receiving any Rules Violations Reports (“RVR”). He has received two RVRs from Defendant Sergeant Baker1, which Plaintiff contends were “illegitimate.” (Id.) Plaintiff seeks to have “false” information removed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.