Armstrong-Harris
Armstrong-Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CEDRIC ARMSTRONG-HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-07637-HSG
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 33 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.
12 On September 15, 2022, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint and motion to strike. See Dkt. No. 33. Plaintiff’s response was due September 29, 2022. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition, as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3. Defendant filed a notice of Plaintiff’s non-opposition on September 30, 2022. This is the third time the Court has issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Dkt. Nos. 16, 20. Plaintiff has repeatedly failed to meet Court deadlines, and the Court has advised Plaintiff that failure to meet deadlines could result in dismissal of the case without further notice. See Dkt. No. 22. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides that where a “plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with…